And that Aston themselves had made 1.9.2 available once again for those that wanted to go back. Yet later I learned, that many in the Aston forum also thought 1.9.2 was also the best stable version. You know-it-alls attacked me for even thinking this. And when I mentioned that this 1.9.2 might be a good thing. But you smart people can do whatever you want too, don't let dummies like me make you change your mind.Īnd you completely glossed over about the whiners that were complaining that they didn't get Aston 1.9.3x, but the 7 month older 1.9.2. When they had enough time to work out most of the bugs and the hardware by then should be able to run it just fine. And I don't see me running Vista until around 2010 or 2011. I waited till 2006 just to upgrade to Windows XP SP2 from Windows 2000. I suppose all of you smart people have already upgraded to Vista. There are some whom like me don't trust v1 of anything very much. Windows XP SP2 (upgrading caused problems with many) As you people ignore many problems in the past with newer versions. You smart people sure have strange logic, I must say. When people point out certain GOTD offerings are for older versions with known bugs, you attack them and claim older versions are the best. Have you documented your claims? If so, can we see them? Or are we supposed to just take your word for it? Really? I only recall only one in the last week. The fact he isn’t a blatant shill such as yourself is to his credit. Why take it elsewhere?Ĭontrary to your latest false assertion, BladedThoth frequently praises software offered on GOTD. Why? That is what this comment section is for. There’s nothing stopping you from starting a website consisting of your exhaustive 6-hour reviews of software offered here. Part of this comment was deleted for using a personal insult against another commenter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |